linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu, fork: Dynamically allocate 'struct fpu'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55A965C8.3010304@sr71.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:30:00 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu, fork: Dynamically allocate 'struct fpu'

On 07/17/2015 12:23 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Dave, can I put your Signed-off-by into this patch? I have already tested these 
> two patches and they are looking good here - so unless you can see some breakage 
> or other problem I'd prefer it to keep it two patches.

Everything looks good here with your actual two patches applied:

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/