lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:37:55 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> Cc: mingo@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, tomi.valkeinen@...com, airlied@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hch@....de, luto@...capital.net, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, hmh@....eng.br, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jgross@...e.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, tj@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com, toshi.kani@...com, stefan.bader@...onical.com, syrjala@....fi, ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] atyfb: atyfb: address MTRR corner case On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:24:55PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> > > Ingo, > > Boris is on vacation so sending these through you. This v6 addresses one code > comment update requested by Ville. Boris had picked up these patches on his > tree and this series had gone through 0-day bot testing. The only issue it > found was the lack of ioremap_uc() implementation on some architectures which > have an IOMMU. There are two approaches to this issue, one is to go and define > ioremap_uc() on all architectures, another is to provide a default for > ioremap_uc() as architectures catch up. I've gone with the later approach [0], > and so to ensure things won't build-break this patch series must also go > through the same tree as the patch-fixes for ioremap_uc() for missing > ioremap_uc() implementations go through. I intend on following up with > implementing ioremap_uc() for other architectures but for that I need to get > feedback from other architecture developers and that will take time. > > Tomi, the framebuffer maintainer had already expressed he was OK for this to go > through you. The driver maintainer, Ville, has been Cc'd on all the series, but > has only provided feedback for the comment request as I noted above. This > series addresses the more complex work on the entire series I've been putting > out and as such I've provided a TL;DR full review of what this series does in > my previous v5 patch series, that can be looked at for more details if needed > [1]. > > This series depends on the patch which I recently posted to address compilation > issue on architectures missing ioremap_uc() [0]. If that goes through then it > should be safe to apply this series, otherwise we have to sit and wait until > all architectures get ioremap_uc() properly defined. > > Please let me know if there are any questions. > > [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436488096-3165-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435196060-27350-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com Ingo, please let me know if there are any questions or issues with this series. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists