linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/16] cpu: Wait for RCU grace periods concurrently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1437171616-13832-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:20:09 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/16] cpu: Wait for RCU grace periods concurrently

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

In kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT, _cpu_down() waits for RCU and
RCU-sched grace periods back-to-back, incurring quite a bit more latency
than required.  This commit therefore uses the new synchronize_rcu_mult()
to allow waiting for both grace periods concurrently.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/cpu.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 9c9c9fab16cc..d63b062b6267 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -380,14 +380,14 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
 	 * will observe it.
 	 *
 	 * For CONFIG_PREEMPT we have preemptible RCU and its sync_rcu() might
-	 * not imply sync_sched(), so explicitly call both.
+	 * not imply sync_sched(), so wait for both.
 	 *
 	 * Do sync before park smpboot threads to take care the rcu boost case.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
-	synchronize_sched();
-#endif
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
+		synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_sched);
+	else
+		synchronize_rcu();
 
 	smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/