| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1437175764-24096-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:29:11 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/19] rcu: Make expedited GP CPU stoppage asynchronous
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Sequentially stopping the CPUs slows down expedited grace periods by
at least a factor of two, based on rcutorture's grace-period-per-second
rate. This is a conservative measure because rcutorture uses unusually
long RCU read-side critical sections and because rcutorture periodically
quiesces the system in order to test RCU's ability to ramp down to and
up from the idle state. This commit therefore replaces the stop_one_cpu()
with stop_one_cpu_nowait(), using an atomic-counter scheme to determine
when all CPUs have passed through the stopped state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b310b40a49a2..c5c8509054ef 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3257,18 +3257,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_rcu);
static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
{
- /*
- * There must be a full memory barrier on each affected CPU
- * between the time that try_stop_cpus() is called and the
- * time that it returns.
- *
- * In the current initial implementation of cpu_stop, the
- * above condition is already met when the control reaches
- * this point and the following smp_mb() is not strictly
- * necessary. Do smp_mb() anyway for documentation and
- * robustness against future implementation changes.
- */
- smp_mb(); /* See above comment block. */
+ struct rcu_state *rsp = data;
+
+ /* We are here: If we are last, do the wakeup. */
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->expedited_need_qs))
+ wake_up(&rsp->expedited_wq);
return 0;
}
@@ -3308,9 +3301,9 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
{
int cpu;
long s;
- struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_sched_state;
struct rcu_node *rnp0;
struct rcu_node *rnp1 = NULL;
+ struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_sched_state;
/* Take a snapshot of the sequence number. */
smp_mb(); /* Caller's modifications seen first by other CPUs. */
@@ -3351,16 +3344,26 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rsp->expedited_sequence & 0x1));
/* Stop each CPU that is online, non-idle, and not us. */
+ init_waitqueue_head(&rsp->expedited_wq);
+ atomic_set(&rsp->expedited_need_qs, 1); /* Extra count avoids race. */
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
/* Skip our CPU and any idle CPUs. */
if (raw_smp_processor_id() == cpu ||
!(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
continue;
- stop_one_cpu(cpu, synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop, NULL);
+ atomic_inc(&rsp->expedited_need_qs);
+ stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu, synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
+ rsp, &rdp->exp_stop_work);
}
+ /* Remove extra count and, if necessary, wait for CPUs to stop. */
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->expedited_need_qs))
+ wait_event(rsp->expedited_wq,
+ !atomic_read(&rsp->expedited_need_qs));
+
smp_mb(); /* Ensure expedited GP seen before counter increment. */
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->expedited_sequence, rsp->expedited_sequence + 1);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rsp->expedited_sequence & 0x1);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 2ef036b356f7..4edc277d08eb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
/*
* Define shape of hierarchy based on NR_CPUS, CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, and
@@ -298,6 +299,9 @@ struct rcu_data {
/* ticks this CPU has handled */
/* during and after the last grace */
/* period it is aware of. */
+ struct cpu_stop_work exp_stop_work;
+ /* Expedited grace-period control */
+ /* for CPU stopping. */
/* 2) batch handling */
/*
@@ -491,6 +495,8 @@ struct rcu_state {
atomic_long_t expedited_workdone1; /* # done by others #1. */
atomic_long_t expedited_workdone2; /* # done by others #2. */
atomic_long_t expedited_normal; /* # fallbacks to normal. */
+ atomic_t expedited_need_qs; /* # CPUs left to check in. */
+ wait_queue_head_t expedited_wq; /* Wait for check-ins. */
unsigned long jiffies_force_qs; /* Time at which to invoke */
/* force_quiescent_state(). */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
index d2aab8dcd58e..36c04b46d3b8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
@@ -185,12 +185,13 @@ static int show_rcuexp(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct rcu_state *rsp = (struct rcu_state *)m->private;
- seq_printf(m, "t=%lu tf=%lu wd1=%lu wd2=%lu n=%lu sc=%lu\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "t=%lu tf=%lu wd1=%lu wd2=%lu n=%lu enq=%d sc=%lu\n",
rsp->expedited_sequence,
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_tryfail),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone1),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone2),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_normal),
+ atomic_read(&rsp->expedited_need_qs),
rsp->expedited_sequence / 2);
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists