[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150718134655.GB24587@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:46:55 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in
aesni-intel_asm.S
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:10:19PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Actually I'm not done painting. Personally it seems a little too
> > verbose. I still like ENTRY_FRAME and ENDPROC_FRAME_RETURN :p
>
> Let's balance it out even more:
>
> ENTRY_FRAME(..)
>
> ...
>
> ENDPROC_FRAME(..)
I like the balance, but the "ret" is still non-obvious.
How about:
FRAME_ENTRY(...)
FRAME_RETURN(...)
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists