| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55A9B333.4030506@windriver.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:00:19 +0800 From: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...driver.com> To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> CC: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, paulus <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...il.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "romeo.cane.ext" <romeo.cane.ext@...iant.com> Subject: Re: BUG: perf error on syscalls for powerpc64. On 2015年07月17日 09:59, Ian Munsie wrote: > Excerpts from Sukadev Bhattiprolu's message of 2015-07-17 11:51:04 +1000: >> Are you seeing this on big-endian or little-endian system? >> >> IIRC, I saw the opposite behavior on an LE system a few months ago. >> i.e. without 1028ccf5, 'perf listf|grep syscall' failed. >> >> Applying 1028ccf5, seemed to fix it. > You could be on to something there - IIRC the ABI was changed for LE to > remove the dot symbols. Might be worth testing on both. Yeah, thanks Ian for your hints. it should be the dot symbols. So I'll believe it's good in 4.x, thanks Michael for your patience as well. Cheers, Zumeng > > Cheers, > -Ian > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists