lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150719190809.794228741@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:07:28 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 09/65] mnt: Modify fs_fully_visible to deal with locked ro nodev and atime

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

commit 8c6cf9cc829fcd0b179b59f7fe288941d0e31108 upstream.

Ignore an existing mount if the locked readonly, nodev or atime
attributes are less permissive than the desired attributes
of the new mount.

On success ensure the new mount locks all of the same readonly, nodev and
atime attributes as the old mount.

The nosuid and noexec attributes are not checked here as this change
is destined for stable and enforcing those attributes causes a
regression in lxc and libvirt-lxc where those applications will not
start and there are no known executables on sysfs or proc and no known
way to create exectuables without code modifications

Fixes: e51db73532955 ("userns: Better restrictions on when proc and sysfs can be mounted")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/namespace.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ unlock:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file_system_type *fs_type);
+static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int *new_mnt_flags);
 
 /*
  * create a new mount for userspace and request it to be added into the
@@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ static int do_new_mount(struct path *pat
 			mnt_flags |= MNT_NODEV | MNT_LOCK_NODEV;
 		}
 		if (type->fs_flags & FS_USERNS_VISIBLE) {
-			if (!fs_fully_visible(type))
+			if (!fs_fully_visible(type, &mnt_flags))
 				return -EPERM;
 		}
 	}
@@ -3170,9 +3170,10 @@ bool current_chrooted(void)
 	return chrooted;
 }
 
-static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file_system_type *type)
+static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file_system_type *type, int *new_mnt_flags)
 {
 	struct mnt_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->mnt_ns;
+	int new_flags = *new_mnt_flags;
 	struct mount *mnt;
 	bool visible = false;
 
@@ -3191,6 +3192,19 @@ static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file
 		if (mnt->mnt.mnt_root != mnt->mnt.mnt_sb->s_root)
 			continue;
 
+		/* Verify the mount flags are equal to or more permissive
+		 * than the proposed new mount.
+		 */
+		if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_READONLY) &&
+		    !(new_flags & MNT_READONLY))
+			continue;
+		if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_NODEV) &&
+		    !(new_flags & MNT_NODEV))
+			continue;
+		if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_ATIME) &&
+		    ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_ATIME_MASK) != (new_flags & MNT_ATIME_MASK)))
+			continue;
+
 		/* This mount is not fully visible if there are any
 		 * locked child mounts that cover anything except for
 		 * empty directories.
@@ -3204,6 +3218,10 @@ static bool fs_fully_visible(struct file
 			if (!is_empty_dir_inode(inode))
 				goto next;
 		}
+		/* Preserve the locked attributes */
+		*new_mnt_flags |= mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & (MNT_LOCK_READONLY | \
+							MNT_LOCK_NODEV    | \
+							MNT_LOCK_ATIME);
 		visible = true;
 		goto found;
 	next:	;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ