[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150719190812.846319109@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:11:26 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.riemer@...fitbricks.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 48/58] IB/srp: Fix reconnection failure handling
4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
commit a44074f14ba1ea0747ea737026eb929b81993dc3 upstream.
Although it is possible to let SRP I/O continue if a reconnect
results in a reduction of the number of channels, the current
code does not handle this scenario correctly. Instead of making
the reconnect code more complex, consider this as a reconnection
failure.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
Cc: Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.riemer@...fitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
@@ -1242,11 +1242,8 @@ static int srp_rport_reconnect(struct sr
for (i = 0; i < target->ch_count; i++) {
ch = &target->ch[i];
- if (ret || !ch->target) {
- if (i > 1)
- ret = 0;
+ if (ret || !ch->target)
break;
- }
ret = srp_connect_ch(ch, multich);
multich = true;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists