lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150719204142.GA9844@oracle.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:41:42 +0200
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu-common: Do not use 64 bit  constant
 0xffffffffffffffffl for computing align_mask

On (07/19/15 22:25), Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't GENMASK(align_order-1, 0) work for all cases (assuming
> align_order has a sane value)?

Devices with limits on DMA masks are uncommon, so I'm personally
not an expert at all the variations in this space, but I was thinking
that this doing 

   align_mask = 0xffffffffffffffffull >> (64 - align_order); 

would be the compact answer for both 32 and 64 bit cases here? 

--Sowmini

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ