[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437378870.10831.12.camel@transmode.se>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:54:30 +0000
From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"madalin.bucur@...escale.com" <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/10] dpaa_eth: add support for DPAA Ethernet
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 19:19 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> This introduces the Freescale Data Path Acceleration Architecture
> (DPAA) Ethernet driver (dpaa_eth) that builds upon the DPAA QMan,
> BMan, PAMU and FMan drivers to deliver Ethernet connectivity on
> the Freescale DPAA QorIQ platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
> ---
....
> + net_dev = alloc_etherdev_mq(sizeof(*priv), DPAA_ETH_TX_QUEUES);
> + if (!net_dev) {
> + dev_err(dev, "alloc_etherdev_mq() failed\n");
> + goto alloc_etherdev_mq_failed;
> + }
> +
> + snprintf(net_dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, "fm%d-mac%d",
> + dpa_mac_fman_index_get(pdev),
> + dpa_mac_hw_index_get(pdev));
Should ethernet drivers dictate interface name in user space nowadays?
I would prefer if you didn't.
I am trying these patches on a custom T1042 board using Linux 4.1 but
I cannot get Fixed PHY to work:
libphy: PHY fixed-0:00 not found
fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.2 eth2: Could not connect to PHY fixed-0:00
fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.2 eth2: init_phy() = -19
Not sure what I have missed here, any ideas?
Jocke
PS.
I would really appreciate if you could add new revisions of the FMAN/DPAA driver(s)
to http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/ppc/upstream/linux.git/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists