| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:08:08 +0900 From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: modify how to compute a slice and check a preemptability On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 01:15:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 06:11:00PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote: > > doesn't it make sense? > > No, people have already given you all kinds of reasons why this isn't a i feel sorry. but all kinds?. i got only a reason, that is, latency problem. so i already mentioned both of two cases, because of the reason people told me. furthermore, nobody gave me a reason why the code should use local cfs's nr_running to get period at all. > good change. It is also a very invasive change and you have no > performance numbers one way or another. > > I'm going to fully ignore this thread from now on. sorry for bothering you. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists