[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150720001743.30857.48346.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:17:43 -0400
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, toshi.kani@...com,
arnd@...db.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mcgrof@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, hch@....de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
__ioremap_caller() calls region_is_ram() to walk through the
iomem_resource table to check if a target range is in RAM, which
was added to improve the lookup performance over page_is_ram()
(commit 906e36c5c717 "x86: use optimized ioresource lookup in
ioremap function"). page_is_ram() was no longer used when this
change was added, though.
__ioremap_caller() then calls walk_system_ram_range(), which had
replaced page_is_ram() to improve the lookup performance (commit
c81c8a1eeede "x86, ioremap: Speed up check for RAM pages").
Since both checks walk through the same iomem_resource table for
the same purpose, there is no need to call the two functions.
Furthermore, region_is_ram() always returns with -1, which makes
walk_system_ram_range() as the only check being used at this point.
Therefore, this patch changes __ioremap_caller() to call
walk_system_ram_range() only.
Note, removing the call to region_is_ram() is also necessary to
fix bugs in region_is_ram(). walk_system_ram_range() requires
RAM ranges be page-aligned in the iomem_resource table to work
properly. This restriction has allowed multiple ioremaps to RAM
(setup_data) which are page-unaligned. Using fixed region_is_ram()
will cause these callers to start failing. After all ioremap
callers to setup_data are converted, __ioremap_caller() may call
region_is_ram() instead to remove this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index 63da79114fe9..ccf5c867b2eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
pgprot_t prot;
int retval;
void __iomem *ret_addr;
- int ram_region;
/* Don't allow wraparound or zero size */
last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
@@ -115,26 +114,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
/*
* Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using..
*/
- /* First check if whole region can be identified as RAM or not */
- ram_region = region_is_ram(phys_addr, size);
- if (ram_region > 0) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%lx - 0x%lx\n",
- (unsigned long int)phys_addr,
- (unsigned long int)last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- /* If could not be identified(-1), check page by page */
- if (ram_region < 0) {
- pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
+ pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
__ioremap_check_ram) == 1) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at %pa - %pa\n",
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at %pa - %pa\n",
&phys_addr, &last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
+ return NULL;
}
+
/*
* Mappings have to be page-aligned
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists