[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150720044750.GH3956@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:47:50 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: modify how to compute a slice and check a
preemptability
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:42:38AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:34 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
>
> > yes, i also think that a preemption granularity has little meaning, atually
> > because of tick granularity.
>
> See HR_TICK. It's not cheap though, why it's default off.
yes, i thought so. now, thank to you, i am assured.
thank you,
byungchul
>
> -Mike
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists