| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20150720.124432.1153242227929722638.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:44:32 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix fid_mask when leaving bridge From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:07:07 -0400 > The mv88e6xxx_priv_state structure contains an fid_mask, where 1 means > the FID is free to use, 0 means the FID is in use. > > This patch fixes the bit clear in mv88e6xxx_leave_bridge() when > assigning a new FID to a port. > > Example scenario: I have 7 ports, port 5 is CPU, port 6 is unused (no > PHY). After setting the ports 0, 1 and 2 in bridge br0, and ports 3 and > 4 in bridge br1, I have the following fid_mask: 0b111110010110 (0xf96). > > Indeed, br0 uses FID 0, and br1 uses FID 3. > > After setting nomaster for port 0, I get the wrong fid_mask: 0b10 (0x2). > > With this patch we correctly get 0b111110010100 (0xf94), meaning port 0 > uses FID 1, br0 uses FID 0, and br1 uses FID 3. > > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists