[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201507202258.47697@pali>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:58:47 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux 4.2-rc1 broken Nokia N900
On Monday 20 July 2015 22:46:47 Michael Welling wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 13 July 2015 17:36:07 Michael Welling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > I think nothing special. I just call:
> > > >
> > > > export ARCH=arm
> > > > export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
> > > > make rx51_defconfig
> > > > rm -f arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > > > make -j12 zImage modules omap3-n900.dtb
> > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y cat arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > arch/arm/boot/zImage.new mv
> > > > arch/arm/boot/zImage.new arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > >
> > > Where are you getting rx51_defconfig from?
> > >
> > > This does not appear to be in the kernel source any longer.
> > >
> > > Can you try the above with omap2plus_defconfig?
> >
> > It is in my linux-n900 repository:
> > https://github.com/pali/linux-n900 Repository contains more n900
> > specific patches but SPI code is unpatched
> >
> > https://github.com/pali/linux-n900/blob/HEAD/arch/arm/configs/rx51_
> > defconfig
> >
> > Later in week I can try to compile also with omap2plus_defconfig...
> > But in my opinion kernel should not crash with different
> > configuration.
>
> Has any progress been made on this?
>
Hi, sorry but I did not have time last weekend for testing...
> Seeing as I was dropped into the middle of this thread,
> I took a look at the discussion previous.
>
> It appears that you are building the drivers as modules.
> Perhaps I can again attempt to duplicate the issue using modules.
> Though this should not make a difference.
Yes, you can try to build drivers as modules. Also you can try to use my
rx51_defconfig. Maybe you find something more...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists