linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Avoid registering input device on WMI event laptops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGdLNWE2=jeafsxnNr4uxAFrV702jdH_h_G1vM4ciRS7WPf=6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:49:51 -0600
From:	Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
	<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Avoid registering input device on WMI event laptops

Hi Darren,

2015-07-20 15:55 GMT-06:00 Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:38:57PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
>> Commit f11f999e9890 ("toshiba_acpi: Refuse to load on machines with
>> buggy INFO implementations") denied loading on laptops with a WMI Event
>> GUID given that such laptops manage the hotkeys via that interface,
>> however, such laptops have a working Toshiba Configuration Interface
>> (TCI), and thus, such commit denied several supported features.
>>
>> This patch avoids registering the input device and ignores all hotkey
>> events on laptops with such WMI Event GUI, making the supported
>
> GUID
>
>> features found in those laptops to work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> index 15d8f0d..a3c6ea2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> @@ -2397,6 +2397,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_setup_keyboard(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>>       u32 hci_result;
>>       int error;
>>
>> +     if (wmi_has_guid(TOSHIBA_WMI_EVENT_GUID)) {
>> +             pr_info("WMI event detected, hotkeys won't be monitored\n");
>
> It's best practice to avoid contractions in any form of technical writing. (See
> what I did there? ;-)
>
> While this is good for comments, I feel it's more important for kernel messages.
>
>> +             return 0;
>> +     }
>> +
>>       error = toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(dev);
>>       if (error)
>>               return error;
>> @@ -2730,6 +2735,14 @@ static void toshiba_acpi_notify(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, u32 event)
>>
>>       switch (event) {
>>       case 0x80: /* Hotkeys and some system events */
>> +             /*
>> +              * Machines with this WMI guid aren't supported due to bugs in
>> +              * their AML.
>> +              *
>> +              * Return silently to avoid triggering a netlink event.
>> +              */
>> +             if (wmi_has_guid(TOSHIBA_WMI_EVENT_GUID))
>> +                     return;
>>               toshiba_acpi_process_hotkeys(dev);
>>               break;
>>       case 0x81: /* Dock events */
>> @@ -2816,14 +2829,6 @@ static int __init toshiba_acpi_init(void)
>>  {
>>       int ret;
>>
>> -     /*
>> -      * Machines with this WMI guid aren't supported due to bugs in
>
> Good idea to capitalize acronyms like GUID.
>
>> -      * their AML. This check relies on wmi initializing before
>> -      * toshiba_acpi to guarantee guids have been identified.
>> -      */
>> -     if (wmi_has_guid(TOSHIBA_WMI_EVENT_GUID))
>> -             return -ENODEV;
>> -
>>       toshiba_proc_dir = proc_mkdir(PROC_TOSHIBA, acpi_root_dir);
>>       if (!toshiba_proc_dir) {
>>               pr_err("Unable to create proc dir " PROC_TOSHIBA "\n");
>> --
>> 2.4.3
>>
>>
>
> Functional content looks good. No need to resend, just please keep the above in
> mind for the future. I'll make the minor updates and merge all three after your
> response to the first regarding user:kernel interface - unless of course you
> choose to resend the 3 at the same time, and I'll pick those up.

OK, will keep those things in mind, will wait for comments on first patch and
send a v2.

>
> Thanks Azael,
>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center


Cheers
Azael


-- 
-- El mundo apesta y vosotros apestais tambien --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/