[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150721074847.GA25542@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:48:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/master 1/3] kprobes: Support blacklist functions in
module
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> For some symbols we can do that. But it can conflict with other __section
> attributes e.g. __sched, since a function must be placed in only one
> section. [...]
The the scheduler is not modular, so __sched should not be a problem in itself.
> [...] So, IMHO, using section for expressing its attribute is not a good idea,
> but I couldn't find another option in common function attribute.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#Common-Function-Attributes
>
> Thus I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro which stores the target function
> addresses (not the function itself) in the _kprobe_blacklist section.
So the question is, in which cases do modules need this?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists