linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 31/46] sched: Consider spare cpu capacity at task wake-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:37:20 -0700
From:	Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>
To:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
CC:	<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
	<yuyang.du@...el.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	<rjw@...ysocki.net>, Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
	<pang.xunlei@....com.cn>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <pboonstoppel@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 31/46] sched: Consider spare cpu capacity at task
 wake-up

Hi Morten,

On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> In mainline find_idlest_group() selects the wake-up target group purely
> based on group load which leads to suboptimal choices in low load
> scenarios. An idle group with reduced capacity (due to RT tasks or
> different cpu type) isn't necessarily a better target than a lightly
> loaded group with higher capacity.
> 
> The patch adds spare capacity as an additional group selection
> parameter. The target group is now selected based on the following
> criteria listed by highest priority first:
> 
> 1. If energy-aware scheduling is enabled the group with the lowest
> capacity containing a cpu with enough spare capacity to accommodate the
> task (with a bit to spare) is selected if such exists.
> 
> 2. Return the group with the cpu with most spare capacity and this
> capacity is significant if such group exists. Significant spare capacity
> is currently at least 20% to spare.
> 
> 3. Return the group with the lowest load, unless it is the local group
> in which case NULL is returned and the search is continued at the next
> (lower) level.
> 
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b0294f0..0f7dbda4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5247,9 +5247,10 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>  		  int this_cpu, int sd_flag)
>  {
>  	struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
> -	struct sched_group *fit_group = NULL;
> +	struct sched_group *fit_group = NULL, *spare_group = NULL;
>  	unsigned long min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load = 0;
>  	unsigned long fit_capacity = ULONG_MAX;
> +	unsigned long max_spare_capacity = capacity_margin - SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
>  	int load_idx = sd->forkexec_idx;
>  	int imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2;
>  
> @@ -5257,7 +5258,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>  		load_idx = sd->wake_idx;
>  
>  	do {
> -		unsigned long load, avg_load;
> +		unsigned long load, avg_load, spare_capacity;
>  		int local_group;
>  		int i;
>  
> @@ -5290,6 +5291,16 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>  				fit_capacity = capacity_of(i);
>  				fit_group = group;
>  			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Look for group which has most spare capacity on a
> +			 * single cpu.
> +			 */
> +			spare_capacity = capacity_of(i) - get_cpu_usage(i);
> +			if (spare_capacity > max_spare_capacity) {
> +				max_spare_capacity = spare_capacity;
> +				spare_group = group;
> +			}

Another minor buglet: get_cpu_usage(i) here could be > capacity_of(i)
because usage is bounded by capacity_orig_of(i). Should it be bounded by
capacity_of() instead?

>  		}
>  
>  		/* Adjust by relative CPU capacity of the group */
> @@ -5306,6 +5317,9 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>  	if (fit_group)
>  		return fit_group;
>  
> +	if (spare_group)
> +		return spare_group;
> +
>  	if (!idlest || 100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
>  		return NULL;
>  	return idlest;
> 

Thanks,
-Sai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/