[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437468154.32331.29.camel@thorin>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:42:32 +0200
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] x86/stackvalidate: Compile-time stack validation
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 12:50 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
[...]
> It's perhaps distasteful, but it improves performance. And I'm a
> pragmatist at heart ;-)
And you measured the time gain guaranteeing that it actually saves that
much time. Usually that isn't actually measurable ....
And the usual solution is to have a preprocessor symbol to allow people
with lots of time and/or "valgrind" and similar tools to clean up
cleanly and the speed gang can compile that code out.
Kind regards,
Bernd
--
"I dislike type abstraction if it has no real reason. And saving
on typing is not a good reason - if your typing speed is the main
issue when you're coding, you're doing something seriously wrong."
- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists