[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150721010251.GP3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:02:52 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/16] scripts: Make checkpatch.pl warn on
expedited RCU grace periods
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:40PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 17:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:37:54PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > It'd be faster perl without capture groups:
> > >
> > > if ($line =~ /\b(?:synchronize_(?:rcu|sched)_expedited)\s*\(/) {
> >
> > Fair enough, but this pattern is used rather heavily in this script,
> > and I don't trust my perl enough to want to create a new pattern.
> >
> > I see a couple of possible ways forward:
> >
> > 1. I hand this patch off to you, and you update it as you deem fit.
> >
> > 2. I push the patch as is (after the fix below) and you update
> > checkpatch as a whole to use the more efficient code.
> >
> > How would you like to proceed?
>
> Push and fix would work fine.
Very good, will do!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists