linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150721151314.GM3061@x1>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:14 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tuesday 21 July 2015 02:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>On Monday 20 July 2015 01:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On Friday 17 July 2015 04:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>>>On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12:04AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Can you merge this into regulator tree?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Link to MFD - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I need a tag I can pull from Lee.
> >>>>>
> >>>>Great.
> >>>>
> >>>>Lee,
> >>>>It would be helpful, if you could ack below patch,
> >>>>
> >>>>https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704
> >>>
> >>>These patches are yet to be reviewed.  I will unmark those patches as
> >>>important (meaning they will not be reviewed during this iteration).
> >>>Please resubmit a single patch-set containing all of the
> >>>dependencies and Mark and I will work it out between us.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Ok,
> >>
> >>I have just sent single patch, which has dependency on regulator
> >>changes. Please review, ack and queue up.
> >
> >A little presumptuous, don't you think? ;)
> >
> >>[PATCH-v3] mfd: 88pm80x: Add 88pm860 chip type support
> >>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/
> >
> >So nothing depends on this anymore, right?
> >
> 
> No, regulato patch depends on this.
> Mark needs your tag in order to take above patch through regulator tree.

That's not how we usually do things.

However, as this patch is a very simple one, it shouldn't cause too
many issues if it were to go in via the Regulator tree.

> Just to clarify more,
> 
> I have regulator patch which adds support for 88PM860
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/719
> 
> which depends on above patch
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/
> 
> Thanks,
> Vaibhav
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/