[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150721155539.GO3061@x1>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:55:39 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support
> >>>>I have just sent single patch, which has dependency on regulator
> >>>>changes. Please review, ack and queue up.
> >>>
> >>>A little presumptuous, don't you think? ;)
> >>>
> >>>>[PATCH-v3] mfd: 88pm80x: Add 88pm860 chip type support
> >>>>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/
> >>>
> >>>So nothing depends on this anymore, right?
> >>>
> >>
> >>No, regulato patch depends on this.
> >>Mark needs your tag in order to take above patch through regulator tree.
> >
> >That's not how we usually do things.
> >
> >However, as this patch is a very simple one, it shouldn't cause too
> >many issues if it were to go in via the Regulator tree.
> >
>
> Thanks for your ack.
>
> And I understand your concern, but not sure how would you solve such
> dependency?
We usually share immutable branches, which contain all of the patches
in the correct order.
> Another point which keeps bugging me is, git-bisect.
... which also mitigates bisect issues.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists