[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVrXohCwO3g+cvKSPoXKHafc7SNNrht7rgJokYMHmZaoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:27:43 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2015 03:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> The modify_ldt syscall exposes a large attack surface and is
>> unnecessary for modern userspace. Make it optional.
>
> Since this a "default y" option I think we need to make the
> implications of this a bit clearer.
Do you mean improving the help text? To be clear, there's no change
on a non-EXPERT of default EXPERT kernel here.
>
> Do we know what userspace would break?
Some Wine and some DOSEMU most likely. Also many of the exploits I've
written over the past year or two :)
>
> Maybe add a WARN_ONCE() in a stub syscall?
>
I think if we do that then we should do it for all the syscall disabling things.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists