linux-kernel - Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150722042403.GA6345@nazgul.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:24:03 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:50:25PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> hmmm...so this is a case where need to the default the branch
> to the out-of-line branch at boot. That is, we can't just enable
> the out-of-line branch at boot time, b/c it might be too late at
> that point? IE native_sched_clock() gets called very early?

Well, even the layout is wrong here. The optimal thing would be to have:

	NOP
	rdtsc

unlikely:
	/* read jiffies */

at build time. And then at boot time, patch in the JMP over the NOP on
!use_tsc boxes. And RDTSC works always, no matter how early.

I'm fairly sure we can do that now with alternatives instead of jump
labels.

The problem currently is that the 5-byte NOP gets patched in with a JMP
so we have an unconditional forwards JMP to the RDTSC.

Now I'd put my money on most arches handling NOPs better then
unconditional JMPs and this is a hot path...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/