linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1507211710090.12650@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.com>
cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@...sung.com>,
	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a
 seqlock when cpusets are disabled

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Mel Gorman wrote:

> From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> 
> There is a seqcounter that protects spurious allocation fails when a task
> is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need to check the
> seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...se.de>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

but there's a typo in your email address in the signed-off-by line.  Nice 
to know you actually type them by hand though :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/