[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150722104624.GA26553@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:46:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, toshi.kani@...com,
jgross@...e.com, mcgrof@...e.com,
"mnipxh@....com" <mnipxh@....com>,
"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] x86/mm/pat: Do a small optimization and fix in
reserve_memtype
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:06:04PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> how about:
> memtype_lock protects the rb-tree root and the rb-nodes which is a field of memtype from delete/add/lookup in a race.
Use this:
"All pat_rbtree operations need to be performed while holding the
memtype_lock."
> Actually I have same questions. I find these output logs are added in
> commit: 6997ab4982a29925e79f72c3a59823cf944c3529(x86: add PAT related
> debug prints) In the past, *new_type == actual_type == new->type on
> success. codes are below. author use actual_type there.
So this function is one bit PITA. So req_type is used to compute actual
type a bit higher:
actual_type = pat_x_mtrr_type(start, end, req_type);
and from then on actual_type is being used.
BUT!, in order to have *all* debugging information, the last dprintk()
call should dump actual_type and req_type because this way we show what
pat_x_mtrr_type() did too. And we don't need to dump new->type because
this is the !err case and in that case we assigned new_type to it, which
we dump already.
Ok?
Btw, you could also simplify this:
if (is_range_ram == 1) {
err = reserve_ram_pages_type(start, end, req_type, new_type);
return err;
}
to:
if (is_range_ram == 1)
return reserve_ram_pages_type(start, end, req_type, new_type);
while at it.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists