[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55AEDD3E.6060808@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:01:02 -0700
From: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe
On 7/21/2015 3:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:50:28PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver
>>>
>>> This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data
>>> but ARM64 does not,
>>
>> Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of
>> removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we
>> need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64.
>>
>> and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why
>>> not?),
>>
>> under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:
>>
>> 41 /*
>> 42 * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
>> 43 */
>> 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> 45 {
>> 46 dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
>> 47
>> 48 return 0;
>> 49 }
>>
>> interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device
>> for arm64.
>>
>> ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64
>>> uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc.
>>
>> Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32
>> based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata.
>
> That all makes sense. I'm just looking for a condensed version of it in
> the changelog because it takes some digging to figure it out, and in a
> couple months even the implicit context of "somebody's working to combine
> arm32 and arm64" will be gone. So we need a changelog that motivates this
> patch as it is.
>
Okay I will re-submit a new patch with a commit message that explains
the change in more details.
Thanks,
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists