[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55AFA900.6040605@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:30:24 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
CC: Sven Brauch <mail@...nbrauch.de>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Toby Gray <toby.gray@...lvnc.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix data loss in cdc-acm
On 07/22/2015 04:40 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Let me know if you need help instrumenting the tty buffers/throttling
>> to help figure out what the actual problem is.
>>
>> Regarding the patch itself, I have no opinion on the suitability of
>> simply not resubmitting urbs. However, that is exactly how the
>> throttle
>> mechanism works, and the tty buffer API is specifically designed to
>> allow drivers to manage flow via that interface as well (especially
>> for high-throughput drivers).
>
> Could you please expand on how this is supposed to work?
> For once how does one learn that room is available again?
There are basically 3 mechanisms for managing rx data:
1. Allocate space when the data arrives; drop data if no space is avail
and indicate buf_overrun. This is what most drivers do.
2. Allocate space when the data arrives; try to buffer uncopied data
and resubmit the data later. Some high-throughput drivers (in the wild)
do this (but less so now that the tty buffer space is configurable).
3. Pre-allocate space _before_ the data arrives (with tty_buffer_request_room());
this is applicable to subsystems which know how much data can be in-flight
at any one time. This guarantees that when rx data arrives buffer space is
available (since it has already been allocated).
Drivers that use method 2 typically attempt to recopy the buffered data
when either new data arrives or @ unthrottle. I've seen others use deferred
work as well.
AFAIK no driver/subsystem is using method 3 for guaranteed delivery
of in-flight data, but it seems ideally suited to usb serial.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists