linux-kernel - Re: [patch] workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1437578340.3484.15.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:19:00 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on
 wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs

On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 10:11 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:24:46AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work items queued to a bound workqueue always run
> > > locally.  This is a good thing normally, but not when the user has
> > 
> > The constant name used there is a bit misleading but you can't put
> > work items which are queued w/ queue_work() on foreign cpus by
> > default.  queue_work() has always guaranteed local execution.  The
> > problem is that workqueue can't currently tell whether a queue_work()
> > user expects cpu locality for correctness or optimization.  It'd be
> > great if we introduce queue_work_on_local() or sth and replace
> > correctness ones with it but that involves auditing each and every
> > queue_work() usage.  If anybody is up for the task, I'd be happy to
> > help.
> 
> Oh well.  That puts a big dent in the utility of wq_unbound_cpumask, but
> too bad.  If someone has a big enough HPC itch, they'll scratch it.

Ew, looking at the numbers, they may prefer to either a) pretend to not
notice, or b) scurry off to HPC'R'US store if a) won't fly ;-)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/