linux-kernel - Re: Having Linux handle different "types" of memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55AFC324.9010401@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:21:56 -0700
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Having Linux handle different "types" of memory

On 07/22/2015 08:19 AM, Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm using an ARMv7 platform (Cortex A9) on Linux 3.14
>
> The system supports two memory modules.
>
> For performance reasons, memory is "transparently" interleaved
> (with a 128-byte grain). That is, when the CPU accesses addresses
> 0-127, it hits DRAM0; addresses 128-255, it hits DRAM1, and so on.
>
> The problem is that other devices in the system, mainly the
> Ethernet controller, didn't get the "transparent interleaving"
> treatment. They just see DRAM0 and DRAM1. And I'm guessing this
> will generate all kinds of "interesting" problems when I try to
> DMA from the Ethernet controller's memory to DRAM...
>
> Is there a way to tell Linux:
>
> 1) this 1GB memory chunk here is for you and your private allocations,
> but don't use it for talking to devices/peripherals.
>
> 2) this 1GB memory chunk there is for talking to devices/peripherals,
> but it has lower performance, so try not to use it for your own
> private memory pools, but you can if memory is /really/ tight.
>
> Is there something like this?
>
> Maybe one of the NUMA policies?
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> (I don't see any arch/arm/mm/numa.c however)
>
> Maybe I can pretend that there is some kind of IOMMU?
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h
>
> Or maybe there is an obvious solution that I'm missing?
>

I don't think there is an easy solution right now. This is still
an open problem as far as I know. You might look into whether
marking one of the regions as a CMA region would allow you the
control you need.

Thanks,
Laura

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/