[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW4o3Gq=yh54nD5d+n=HVS02c+WdcZ17yCUPhZfjtfSfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 19:12:40 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> modify_ldt has questionable locking and does not synchronize
>> threads. Improve it: redesign the locking and synchronize all
>> threads' LDTs using an IPI on all modifications.
>
> What does this fix? I can see sending an IPI if the LDT is
> reallocated, but on every update seems unnecessary.
>
It prevents nastiness in which you're in user mode with an impossible
CS or SS, resulting in potentially interesting artifacts in
interrupts, NMIs, etc.
> --
> Brian Gerst
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists