[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1507221641310.31598@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:50:25PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > hmmm...so this is a case where need to the default the branch
> > to the out-of-line branch at boot. That is, we can't just enable
> > the out-of-line branch at boot time, b/c it might be too late at
> > that point? IE native_sched_clock() gets called very early?
>
> Well, even the layout is wrong here. The optimal thing would be to have:
>
> NOP
> rdtsc
>
> unlikely:
> /* read jiffies */
>
> at build time. And then at boot time, patch in the JMP over the NOP on
> !use_tsc boxes. And RDTSC works always, no matter how early.
RDTSC doesn't work on 486...
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists