linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] FPGA Manager Framework and Simple FPGA Bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:39:56 -0500
From:	atull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC:	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
	<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <pavel@...x.de>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<philip@...ister.org>, <rubini@...dd.com>,
	<s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	<kyle.teske@...com>, <nico@...aro.org>, <balbi@...com>,
	<m.chehab@...sung.com>, <davidb@...eaurora.org>, <rob@...dley.net>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <cesarb@...arb.net>,
	<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<galak@...eaurora.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	Petr Cvek <petr.cvek@....cz>, <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	<dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] FPGA Manager Framework and Simple FPGA Bus

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:32:32PM -0500, atull wrote:
> 
> > I looked some more; I don't see a simple way of deferring probing until 
> > after the filesystem is loaded (so that the image file would be 
> > available), late_initcall is still not late enough.
> 
> That seems weird, are you saying you can't use request firmware at all
> from a compiled in driver? I don't know much about that flow, sorry.
> 
> Having that work would mean the system can have a reasonable in-tree
> use case without requiring the out of tree dt overlay stuff.
> 

It would work if the firmware is built into the kernel image.  It's
the same function call.

Alan

> Jason
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/