[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1507222348580.1141@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rpurdie@...ys.net, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: export LEDs as class devices in sysfs
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I am however not sure whether input_leds_connect() is not too unkind to
> > unnamed LEDs and shouldn't be more tolerant to those in the long term.
>
> Maybe.
>
> > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Input: leds: don't attempt to deregister unnamed LEDs
> >
> > input_leds_connect() is skipping registration of LEDs for which
> > there is no symbolic name in input_led_info[].
>
> Yes, and rather than testing for "no name" special case at two places,
> what about simply giving up when we see such error?
Well, that's quite the oposite of the "be more tolerant" aproach proposed
above :)
I don't see a reason why the sole fact that the device has at least one
LED that kernel can't handle properly should mean that neither of the
other LEDs will work.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists