[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B17139.2070707@plumgrid.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:56:57 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: wangnan0@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that
get the selected hardware PMU conuter
On 7/23/15 2:42 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
> According to the perf_event_map_fd and index, the function
> bpf_perf_event_read() can convert the corresponding map
> value to the pointer to struct perf_event and return the
> Hardware PMU counter value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
...
> +static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
> +{
> + struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
> + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> + struct perf_event *event;
> +
> + if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> + event = array->events[index];
> + if (!event)
> + return -EBADF;
probably ENOENT makes more sense here.
> +
> + if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + return -ENOENT;
and -EINVAL here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists