[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gwdNV8vbf4O8aVC87xpiwjMfnd9uRLaQ26R95SiaSosg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:02:58 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@...com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] arch: introduce memremap()
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:15:41PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Anyway so why is WB and WT allowed if you are going to remove WC and not add UC?
>
Because all existing usages of WB and WT mappings are clearly free of
I/O side effect concerns. The WC and now UC usages are a muddy mix of
"sometimes there's I/O side effects, but it depends by arch and
driver".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists