linux-kernel - RE: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: mach: Improvements for 4.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <028b01d0c51d$553710e0$ffa532a0$@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:58:16 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To:	'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz' 
	<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: mach: Improvements for 4.3

Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> On 21.07.2015 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 2015-07-21 14:13 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>:
> >> 2015-07-21 14:02 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>:
> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[...]

> >>>> --
> >>>
> >>> Applied above changes into fixes/non-critical, next/cleanup-samsung,
> >>> next/dt-samsung and next/cpufreq-clk-samsung according to the change.
> >
> > Cc-ed Bartlomiej,
> >
> > One issue found: splitting DTS change for Exynos 5250 cpufreq to
> > separate branch will break bisectability. The commit "ARM: dts:
> > Exynos5250: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property":
> > 1. MUST be put after "clk: samsung: exynos5250: add cpu clock
> > configuration data and instantiate cpu clock" to prevent build
> > failures,
> > 2. should be put before "ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq
> > driver for Exynos5250" to prevent lost cpufreq functionality.
> >
> > Doing otherwise would lose bisectability which is really unfortunate
> > when you can simply avoid it. This should remain in the same branch -
> > next/cpufreq-clk-samsung.
> 
> Dear Kukjin,
> 
> Nothing changed since yesterday... so let me point this in a more clear
> way. The way you divided the patchset causes build errors:
> 
> --------------
> HEAD is now at 565872a601c4... ARM: dts: add CPU OPP and regulator
> supply property for exynos5250
> 
> ERROR: Failed build: -A arm -c exynos on
> 565872a601c4d91a75b917b1fb40ff27ad7ebb08
> 
> LOGS:
> Error: ../arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi:65.21-22 syntax error
> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dtb] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [dtbs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> --------------
> 
> This breaks bisectability without any special valid reason.
> 
Hi,

I couldn't check e-mail yesterday because of annual health check.
Anyway, I'll look at the error and handle it soon.

Thanks for your check.
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/