linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] powerpc/powernv: detect supported nest pmus and its events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:53:44 +0530
From:	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC:	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] powerpc/powernv: detect supported nest pmus and
 its events



On Thursday 23 July 2015 02:41 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 11:33 +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 09:37 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>>>  
>>>>  static struct perchip_nest_info p8_nest_perchip_info[P8_NEST_MAX_CHIPS];
>>>> +static struct nest_pmu *per_nest_pmu_arr[P8_NEST_MAX_PMUS];
>>>> +
>>>> +static int nest_event_info(struct property *pp, char *name,
>>>> +			struct nest_ima_events *p8_events, int string, u32 val)
>>> 'int string' is a bit confusing. 'bool is_string' might be clearer, but
>>> I think it would be even better still to have different functions for
>>> string and non-string cases, especially because you only need val in the
>>> non-string case.
>> I would perfer to be a single function, since most of the code is same
>> just of the sting or val part. yes. We can make is as is_string and will
>> add comment explaining what is done here? 
> I think Daniel's right, it would be better as two functions.
>
> The only part that is common after the if (string) check is the
> p8_events->ev_value = buf assignment.
>
> So you should be able to keep all the code up to the if (string) check in a
> shared function and just have two wrappers that use it.
>
> cheers

Sure. Will do.

Maddy

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/