linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] target: respond to unknown initiators with sensible REPORT LUNS list length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150723094109.GF5382@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:41:09 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@...ern.com>
Cc:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	"open list:TARGET SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:TARGET SUBSYSTEM" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joern Engel <joern@...estorage.com>,
	Spencer Baugh <Spencer.baugh@...estorage.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: respond to unknown initiators with sensible
 REPORT LUNS list length

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:08:17PM -0700, Spencer Baugh wrote:
>  done:
> +	/*
> +	 * If no real LUNs are accessible, report an allocation length
> +	 * of 1 LUN to account for virtual LUN 0.
> +	 */
> +	if (lun_count == 0)
> +		lun_count = 1;
> +

Shouldn't the code actually report the virtual lun zero instead of just
accounting for it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/