[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B0B738.1050603@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:43:20 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/panic: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on
NMI
(2015/07/23 17:15), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:14:21AM +0900, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
>> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(panic_lock);
>
> At the very least this should be a raw spinlock, but wth aren't you
> using a simple atomic_xchg() ?
Thanks for the comment.
I just followed the current panic_lock implementation.
Using atomic_xchg() may be OK. I'll try another version
with atomic_xchg().
Regards,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists