[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B0BAA9.4020106@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:58:01 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com, linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Silvan Jegen <s.jegen@...il.com>,
Walter Harms <wharms@....de>
Subject: Re: Draft 3 of bpf(2) man page for review
On 07/23/2015 12:12 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 7/22/15 1:10 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> BPF maps are a generic data structure for storage of different
>> data types. A user process can create multiple maps (with
>> key/value-pairs being opaque bytes of data) and access them via
>> file descriptors. Differnt eBPF programs can access the same
>> maps in parallel. It's up to the user process and eBPF program
>> to decide what they store inside maps.
>
> typo in 'Different'
Fixed.
>> eBPF program types
>> By picking prog_type, the program author selects a set of helper
>> functions that can be called from the eBPF program and the corre‐
>> sponding format of struct bpf_context (which is the data blob
>> passed into the eBPF program as the first argument). For exam‐
>> ple, programs loaded with a prog_type of
>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER may call the bpf_map_lookup_elem()
>> helper, whereas some other program types may not be able to
>> employ this helper. The set of functions available to eBPF pro‐
>> grams of a given type may increase in the future.
>
> overall it's all correct, but today bpf_map_lookup_elem() is allowed
> for all program types. May be change that to:
> "BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE may call the bpf_probe_read() helper"
> since only type_kprobe programs can call it.
> type_sockets/type_sched_* cannot.
Changed, as you suggest.
>> The bpf_context argument is a pointer to a struct sk_buff.
>> Programs cannot access the fields of sk_buff directly.
>
> Probably drop last sentence and replace 'sk_buff' with '__sk_buff'
> in the first? Or for the first version we can drop both sentences.
I did the former.
> The rest looks great. Thank you much!
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists