[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB4PR02MB272E255AAD6D46A0CB6F459D6820@DB4PR02MB272.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:40:36 +0000
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] serial: 8250_dw: use serial_in() and not readl()
From: Peter Hurley [mailto:peter@...leysoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial: 8250_dw: use serial_in() and not readl()
> From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
>
> This is now matches device endianness.
> I'm not seeing where serial_in() is used here, as claimed by the $subject.
Thanks, I will "reword" my commit in v2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists