linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:11:47 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Cc:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
<octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have
>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so
>> change all driver's checks accordingly.
>>
>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree
>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch
>> above.
>>
>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that
> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed?

Me or Torvalds?

This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not
go through IIO.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/