[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B0EE9D.7000600@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:39:41 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Silvan Jegen <s.jegen@...il.com>,
Walter Harms <wharms@....de>
Subject: Re: Draft 3 of bpf(2) man page for review
On 07/23/2015 03:36 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
...
>> Ok, I guess we could revisit/clarify that at a later point in time. I'd add
>> a TODO comment to the source or the like, as this also is related to the 2nd
>> below use case (aggregation/accounting), where an array is typically used.
>
> Okay. FIXME added.
Great.
[...]
>> I'd maybe only mention in addition that in log_level=0 case, we also must not
>> provide a log_buf and log_size, otherwise we get EINVAL.
>
> I changed the text to:
>
> * log_level verbosity level of the verifier. A value of zero
> means that the verifier will not provide a log; in this case,
> log_buf must be a NULL pointer, and log_size must be zero.
Ok.
[...]
> Thanks for clearing that up -- I added the following sentence
>
> JIT compiler for eBPF is currently available for the x86-64, arm64,
> and s390 architectures.
>
> Okay?
Yep.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists