lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:38:33 +0300 From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote: > > Octavian Purdila writes: >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote: >>> >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> >> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? >> Thanks, >> Tavi > > Hi Tavi, > This is fine, but is there a particular rush to get it in? > Otherwise I'll just take it through the IIO tree. > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> Hi Jonathan, Didn't mean to rush things, I haven't seen any activity on this for some time and thought it was forgotten. I was also confused with the status of Mika's patch, but now that I learned it was merged in 4.2, its clear to me that this patch needs to go through the IIO tree. Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists