[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150723183228.GR15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:32:28 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
hpa@...or.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, yasu.isimatu@...il.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, gongzhaogang@...pur.com,
qiaonuohan@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent.
Hello, Tang.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:44:53PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> Allocating cpuid when a new cpu comes up and reusing the cpuid when it
> comes up again is possible. But I'm not quite sure if it will be less
> modification
> because we still need an array or bit map or something to keep the mapping,
> and select backup nodes for cpus on memory-less nodes when allocating
> memory.
>
> I can post a set of patches for this idea. And then we can see which one is
> better.
I suspect the difference could be that in the current code the users
(workqueue) can remain the same while if we do it lazily there
probably needs to be a way to poke it. As long as the IDs are
allocated to the online CPUs first, I think pre-allocating everything
should be fine too.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists