linux-kernel - Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:29:05 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@...il.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:02:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:54:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > That would be bad, how can we force it to emit 5 bytes?
> > 
> > .byte 0xe9 like we used to do in static_cpu_has_safe().
> 
> Like so then?
> 
> static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool inv)
> {
> 	unsigned long kval = (unsigned long)key + inv;
> 
> 	asm_volatile_goto("1:"
> 		".byte 0xe9\n\t .long %l[l_yes]\n\t"
> 		".pushsection __jump_table,  \"aw\" \n\t"
> 		_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
> 		_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
> 		".popsection \n\t"
> 		: :  "i" (kval) : : l_yes);
> 
> 	return false;
> l_yes:
> 	return true;
> }

Yap.

But, we can do even better and note down what kind of JMP the compiler
generated and teach __jump_label_transform() to generate the right one.
Maybe this struct jump_entry would get a flags member or so. This way
we're optimal.

Methinks...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/