[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150724155011.670c2696@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:50:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (i386
defconfig) failed like this:
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'hugetlbfs_fallocate':
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:578:13: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
pseudo_vma.vm_policy =
^
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:579:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_shared_policy_lookup' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&HUGETLBFS_I(inode)->policy,
^
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:595:28: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
mpol_cond_put(pseudo_vma.vm_policy);
^
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:601:27: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
mpol_cond_put(pseudo_vma.vm_policy);
^
Caused by commit
6b2ac4455b3d ("hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate()")
vm_policy and mpol_shared_policy_lookup are only defined when CONFIG_NUMA
is set.
I have reverted that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists