lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:49:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>, Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: question about drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Yes for dmaengine drivers I do ask this question which typically ends up in > > > driver invoking devm_irq_free() in driver's remove callback > > > > > > IMHO don't think devm irq calls are very useful, they do make stuff > > > complicate > > > > Would it be better then to just go back to request_irq (or whatever is > > appropriate in this case). It would seem that the devm property can never > > be relied on, so there is no point to use it. > > Yes I do think that is right way in this case Thanks for your help. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists