[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgNAkj+FvuXh0sjx6A_RD9_0BaYm_xsyXS6Ym5svcmXtBVKmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:57:34 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mmap.2: document the munmap exception for underlying page size
Hello David,
On 23 July 2015 at 22:52, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> >> Should we also add a similar comment for the mmap offset? Currently
>> >> the man page says:
>> >>
>> >> "offset must be a multiple of the page size as returned by
>> >> sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)."
>> >>
>> >> For hugetlbfs, I beieve the offset must be a multiple of the
>> >> hugetlb page size. A similar comment/exception about using
>> >> the "underlying page size" would apply here as well.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yes, that makes sense, thanks. We should also explicitly say that mmap(2)
>> > automatically aligns length to be hugepage aligned if backed by hugetlbfs.
>>
>> And, surely, it also does something similar for mmap()'s 'addr'
>> argument?
>>
>> I suggest we add a subsection to describe the HugeTLB differences. How
>> about something like:
>>
>> Huge page (Huge TLB) mappings
>> For mappings that employ huge pages, the requirements for the
>> arguments of mmap() and munmap() differ somewhat from the
>> requirements for mappings that use the native system page size.
>>
>> For mmap(), offset must be a multiple of the underlying huge page
>> size. The system automatically aligns length to be a multiple of
>> the underlying huge page size.
>>
>> For munmap(), addr and length must both be a multiple of the
>> underlying huge page size.
>> ?
>>
>
> Looks good, please add my acked-by.
Done. Thanks for checking the text.
> The commit that expanded on the
> documentation of this behavior was
> 80d6b94bd69a7a49b52bf503ef6a841f43cf5bbb.
>
> Answering from your other email, no, this behavior in the kernel has not
> changed recently but we found it wasn't properly documented so we wanted
> to fix that both in the kernel tree and in the man-pages to make it
> explicit.
Okay -- thanks for the clarification.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists